Months following the rapid rebel offensive led by Islamists that toppled Bashar al-Assad’s regime, Syria continues to be a nation in crisis. The recently formed transitional administration, under the leadership of Ahmad al-Sharaa, is facing increasing security issues, with violent opposition from remaining Assad supporters. Although the breakdown of Assad’s repressive government was a significant milestone in Syria’s 13-year civil war, achieving lasting peace and stability is turning out to be extremely complex.
The transitional administration, mainly made up of individuals who gained recognition from opposition hubs such as Idlib in the northwest, has taken over a fragmented nation ravaged by prolonged conflict. The dismantling of Assad-era institutions, including the military and the Baath Party, has resulted in the displacement of hundreds of thousands of former regime officials and allies. A significant number of these individuals have declined to make peace with the new administration, sparking unrest that jeopardizes the stability of the delicate government.
A persistent menace from supporters of Assad
In the periods following Assad’s exit, his supporters have become a major rebel force. These leftovers of the former regime, many deeply rooted in Syria’s military, intelligence, and political structures, have utilized their existing networks to coordinate armed opposition. This revolt has been especially active in the coastal regions of Latakia and Tartous, traditional strongholds of the Assad lineage and residence to a substantial portion of Syria’s Alawite minority.
In the months since Assad’s departure, his loyalists have emerged as a significant insurgent force. These remnants of the former regime, many of whom were deeply embedded in Syria’s military, intelligence, and political systems, have leveraged their pre-existing networks to organize armed resistance. This insurgency has been particularly active in the coastal provinces of Latakia and Tartous, long-standing strongholds of the Assad family and home to much of Syria’s Alawite minority.
The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights recently reported a deadly ambush in Latakia province, where gunmen targeted government forces attempting to apprehend a former Assad official. The attack left at least 13 security personnel dead and set off a wave of violence across the region. By the following day, clashes had escalated, resulting in over 120 deaths—a stark reminder of the challenges facing the interim government.
Escalating Strains in Alawite Areas
Rising tensions in Alawite regions
The insurgent activity in Latakia and Tartous has further strained relations between Syria’s Sunni-led transitional government and the Alawite minority, a Shia offshoot that formed the backbone of Assad’s regime. The Alawites, who enjoyed privileges and power under the Assad government, have faced significant losses in the aftermath of its collapse. Many now feel marginalized and targeted, despite Sharaa’s assurances that his administration will respect Syria’s diverse religious communities.
Recent reports of violence against Alawite communities have deepened these tensions. Activists have accused government-aligned gunmen of killing dozens of male residents in Alawite areas, a claim that has not been independently verified but has nonetheless sparked outrage. Such incidents risk driving more Alawites into the arms of insurgent groups, further complicating the government’s efforts to stabilize the region.
The situation in Syria’s south also remains precarious. While a deal was reached with Druze forces earlier this week to ease tensions, the government continues to face resistance from various factions across the country. With different regions controlled by competing groups backed by foreign powers, the interim administration’s authority is limited and fragmented.
In addition to the pressing security challenges, Syria’s interim government is facing a severe economic crisis. Years of conflict have resulted in nine out of ten Syrians living in poverty, and the nation continues to suffer under the heavy international sanctions placed during Assad’s tenure. Sharaa’s government has prioritized the removal of these sanctions, seeing it as vital for economic recovery and establishing legitimacy worldwide.
Nevertheless, Western countries remain cautious about Sharaa’s motives, with some doubting that the new government can genuinely abandon the repressive methods of the Assad period. This skepticism has hindered attempts to gain international backing, placing Syria’s economy in a vulnerable state. The interim administration’s capacity to rejuvenate the nation will hinge on its effectiveness in tackling both domestic security issues and foreign diplomatic obstacles.
A nation split
Even after Assad’s downfall, Syria continues to be a mosaic of rival factions and external forces. The interim government’s authority is anything but complete, as diverse groups dominate different regions of the nation. These factions, frequently supported by foreign entities with conflicting agendas, further complicate Syria’s delicate political scenario.
For Sharaa, the challenge of bringing the nation together involves winning the people’s trust as much as it does defeating the insurgent menace. His administration has urged ex-members of Assad’s security apparatus to lay down their arms and embrace reconciliation, yet advancement has been gradual. “We are monitoring everyone, but we aim to avoid giving the impression of a witch hunt,” stated a senior official in the interim government. This careful strategy illustrates the fragile equilibrium the new leadership must maintain as it seeks to re-establish order without isolating important parts of the populace.
For Sharaa, the task of unifying the country is as much about earning the trust of its people as it is about overcoming the insurgent threat. His administration has called on former members of Assad’s security forces to surrender their weapons and accept reconciliation, but progress has been slow. “We are keeping an eye on everyone, but we don’t want to create the impression that we are hunting them down,” said a high-ranking official in the transitional government. This cautious approach reflects the delicate balance the new leadership must strike as it attempts to restore order without alienating key segments of the population.
The ousting of Bashar al-Assad was a pivotal moment in Syria’s history, yet the transition to peace and stability is riddled with challenges. From the insurgent dangers presented by Assad’s supporters to the profound splits among Syria’s religious and ethnic groups, the future remains uncertain. The interim administration must maneuver through these difficulties while attending to the urgent demands of a populace ravaged by over ten years of conflict.
Simultaneously, Syria’s leadership encounters increasing global scrutiny as they work to remove sanctions and gain the support necessary to reconstruct the nation. For the interim government, success will hinge on its capability to tackle the underlying causes of unrest, promote inclusivity, and show a sincere commitment to moving away from the authoritarian practices of the past.
At the same time, Syria’s leaders face mounting international scrutiny as they seek to lift sanctions and secure the support needed to rebuild the country. For the transitional government, success will depend on its ability to address the root causes of unrest, foster inclusivity, and demonstrate a genuine commitment to breaking from the authoritarian practices of the past.
As clashes continue and tensions rise, Syria’s future hangs in the balance. The coming months will be critical for Sharaa’s government as it works to consolidate power, restore security, and lay the foundation for a more stable and prosperous nation.